Fossil records do not put the picture of the world we have lost in a clean perspective; its localised plain presents the blurred scene of a buried life whose physical movement cannot be determined; and from the fossil it is unwise to study the events which the society of its time passed through.

Can a scientist distinguish looking at the humans’ fossils(!), and say, which one of them was a scientific and which one of them was not? Do the present day scholars find any bitter struggle among different ancient scribes of their time from their literary works?

Differences relating to origin of God and origin of God’s time on earth require a huge span of living time on earth. How the scientists of our time who are suffering from mortality put their records straight when they are again suffering from academic differences and nationalistic trends in their addressed outlook in fossil studies? Studies on religious belief adopt a nationalistic view, and academics support the views through published matters in respective geographical boundaries of their nationhood. Conferences are organised to circulate the contents of the views that do not at the outset present diverse views on religious stand of respective scholars. And this generate a struggling agenda for the world whose mortals wear a frame of weak understanding of ideas on God that is liable to change frequently with absence of a definite region that upheld the origin of ideas on God ‘first’ when no nationalistic trends like ours developed at that time. It was nations of God not of ‘Humans’ then.

Immortality is defined through a time period, and through presence of a single or a group life system that defies existence of time. A person’s life span does not allow him to believe on the idea of immortality as he never sees around him a person holding a life from an unseen period. But the idea lives in the context of appearance of the Bodhisattvas and the Buddhas on the world. This is very immaculate and clear.

Seats of worship of Gods present an immortal view of time crossing across differences in religious faiths. A sense of human difference when turns from their religious nature to adopt a course of academic line it becomes ugly and argumentative. Adherence to mystery elements in life is not supported academically and this provides an unclean ground for human faiths to live and breathe in biased areas of scientific knowledge.