Darwinism developed in the blank page of an unknown geographical situation where survival accounts of horse-faced, dog-faced, ant-tribes, rat-tribes, pygmies, monkey-tribes, one-legged men, man-eaters, calf eaters, and lotus have not been taken into consideration.

In the survival of the fittest theory force of the tiniest unseen microscopic organism has not been fitted into.

Theology is an inexpressible and unexplainable area of fusion of humans’ action on impromptu thoughts of God. The most disengaged mind comes from Christian theological seeing of world events where geographical elements of its origin are mostly mishandled, misinterpreted and literary mismanaged that always created entangled scientific views on origin of earth and origin of life on unnecessary problems. Idea of God did not originate in a house built by God himself. It is interesting to see Darwinism only sees the Christian view of origin of species; the fact is that those who authored books on origin of life on earth were found to have taken their births in the house of a religion that does not have knowledge of its own origin.

There is no need for science to garner support from theological leaders for a scientific finding; why evolution will seek support of religious leaders who are unknown to the narratives of world religions.

Tenets of theism always refer to a geographical plain in their contents; if Darwinism contains any theosophical elements in its explanatory notes then the slippery side of its theory is indecisive and futile. Theology has no perennial right to comment on a geographical situation or to connect itself to its various graduated parameters for purposeful human existence.

Many scientists talk of a harmonious situation between nature and mind to support factors of existence on an ongoing geographical pocket. But it is one side of a river bank which cannot be reached by crossing the river currents. Intellectual habitation flourishes on the bank of the river not on crest of its flow. River has its own clock that obeys certain law of disappearance of its flow. So no perennial status of any sort has been granted to human society and its different partners of knowledge-players. One is forced to forget many things when comes across a fearful situation that raises question ones’ survivability.

Geographical actualisation of human survival creates knowable plains where existence of God forwards limitless boundaries of perplexities. Here lies the ‘time’ where history loses its accounted self, and all branches of human knowledge becomes wingless to viisualise what existed before and what may come after a moment ahead. There is no clerical definition of time or spiritual boundary for humans to respond to belief on idea of God and his abode above all heads.

There is no natural selection of any sort to call upon changes on earth either at the back or at the front or before or after a million years ago that decides a cauldron of changes for humans to turn into different shapes of nature. Speeches of some intelligent people does not make and break geographical situations to suffer from changes that makes men and women ugly and beautiful at different plains of human existence.

It is a failure of science to consult the self for knowing the stratum of evolutionary spheres;

Christology lives in more than hundred paradoxes, and its scholars are more ignorant about the meaning of ‘Christ’ than about the geographical pocket where Jesus ‘Christ’ was born, preached his ‘Christology’ and died. Voices on return of ‘Christ’ is unscientifically pushed though its meaning truthfully presents a real divine phenomena of unseen characteristic that repeats the scene of divinity not in different geographical regions but in a fixed domain of divinity.

Premillennialists do not own knowledge of their own lives’ ‘past’, but advocates on prophecy of return of ‘Christ’ ; but do not where the place where he will appear.

If the story of the’ Bible’ would be repeated, where it would be, and who would be there to participate in the next biblical events? How the selection of the participators would happen? Would it follow the path of Darwinism or divinity will choose its own followers?

If there is any error in the narratives of events of the sacred literature of the world religions, how the scientists came to know it.

Geological views on evolutionary process are dangerously contaminated with self repulsive theorise of their own time. They do not the meaning of ‘Eden’ and its earthy location on earth. Their views do not have a ‘past’ but they speak on others’ past.

Post-Darwinian era scientists have turned to become clerics who see ‘past’ of earth as different from ‘past’ of humanity; antiquity was not an area where ‘past’ of human products detached itself from their ‘future’, and products produced by divinity becomes different from products produced by humans, and again their area of operation were differently located for comparative reasons.  Process of annihilation is more assured and supported by scientific reasons than by any other crude classroom opinion. The mechanism which helped humans to produce their products defines a typical ‘place’, an environment, and an assemble of other geographical elements which collectively are liable to suffer from loss of their ‘time’ on earth. This temporariness defines evolutionary scenes to continually sustain itself along with a deep process of annihilation and total disappearance of recognisability of human actions of one time from the other. So antiquity disappears in and through humans’ future actions retendered by renewed geographical situation.