Some scholars have tried to analyse the metal hoards and tools from their mere assemblages at scattered sites in the present day Crete and Greece and advocate on an elite context of their relationship with ancient Crete and Greeks. There is no reason whatsoever to call them ‘Mycenaean caches’; this type of individual dissections of ancient Greece is at the root of all misguiding principles on sources of world history. Ancient Crete is Cete or Cetiya of Pali texts.
Use of implements cannot be always elite in nature and to measure the scrap gatherings at different points in a city cannot specify any grouping of tools. How can a scholar without any base forwards a view on ancient Greece’s use of various metals in their daily use today? But scholars do this; and they throw their opinions as if they were eyewitness to certain events of ancient Greece. Scholars when talk of 12th and 13th B.C. Greece, they do not know that the ancient Greece is in no way related to the present day Greece.. When name of a metal called ta-ra-si-ja is used over which Pylian administrative had control, there arises two points on it : name of the metal identifies name of a place which must have been under Pylian control or it may have otherwise been located in a neighbourly place from it. What does this Pylian refer to in the context of the ancient history of Greece? Many things, it is observed, scholars like to write from their own mind to build a picture of the era even though its history is preserved elsewhere they do not like to read and refer to.
Pylian is not Greek polis but it represents always Palibothra of ancient world history which was the capital of ancient Magadha and which Megasthenes and Herodotus have reflected upon. It does not refer even to birthplace of Alexander at Pelius. A scholar should be very clear on geographical situation of ancient Mycenaean seat of administration when he speaks of ‘Mycenaean assemblage of scraps.
Ta-ra-si-ja refers to the valley of Sajur Valley of the Bible which is exactly the same as the valley of the river Sarju of the epic the Ramayana. Seat of Ajodhya was in the Ramayanic time was at Toya same as troy of the Homeric epics.
It is a great mistake when scholars try to link Geographic Information System (GIS) analysis to ancient Cyprus and refers to its Iron Age period without knowing where the Iron mines were located in the ancient times.
Cyprus was known to ancient people and to ancient literature as seat of worship of Kubera, the God of wealth and trade. It was one of the Eight Gods of the Astarte or Asta Lokapala of the primitive times on human civilization. Cyprito again does not refer to Cyprus, it stands for the monastic Capotika or Kapotika, the most famous bird monastery of the ancient world which was then a part of Egyptian territory(Og Island). Sanctuary site of Vavla-Kapsalaes identifies Arabela or Alaba or Alavi, Alburg or Uruvela monastery linked to Kapasalaes(or Capala, or Kapalika) monastery near Epirus and Alexandria. This is how the present archaeological study stumbles on its knowledge of the ancient world. It does not refer to information preserved in other literature. Stone fragments should not be relied upon when Europe and Middle East are the ‘second settlements’ of ancient migrants after the Flood. Failure of the concepts and approaches of landscape archaeology does not help in revealing any truth significant to history of ancient religions. To link everything to environments in the Mediterranean region is a great failure for modern academic scholarship.
Use of implements cannot be always elite in nature and to measure the scrap gatherings at different points in a city cannot specify any grouping of tools. How can a scholar without any base forwards a view on ancient Greece’s use of various metals in their daily use today? But scholars do this; and they throw their opinions as if they were eyewitness to certain events of ancient Greece. Scholars when talk of 12th and 13th B.C. Greece, they do not know that the ancient Greece is in no way related to the present day Greece.. When name of a metal called ta-ra-si-ja is used over which Pylian administrative had control, there arises two points on it : name of the metal identifies name of a place which must have been under Pylian control or it may have otherwise been located in a neighbourly place from it. What does this Pylian refer to in the context of the ancient history of Greece? Many things, it is observed, scholars like to write from their own mind to build a picture of the era even though its history is preserved elsewhere they do not like to read and refer to.
Pylian is not Greek polis but it represents always Palibothra of ancient world history which was the capital of ancient Magadha and which Megasthenes and Herodotus have reflected upon. It does not refer even to birthplace of Alexander at Pelius. A scholar should be very clear on geographical situation of ancient Mycenaean seat of administration when he speaks of ‘Mycenaean assemblage of scraps.
Ta-ra-si-ja refers to the valley of Sajur Valley of the Bible which is exactly the same as the valley of the river Sarju of the epic the Ramayana. Seat of Ajodhya was in the Ramayanic time was at Toya same as troy of the Homeric epics.
It is a great mistake when scholars try to link Geographic Information System (GIS) analysis to ancient Cyprus and refers to its Iron Age period without knowing where the Iron mines were located in the ancient times.
Cyprus was known to ancient people and to ancient literature as seat of worship of Kubera, the God of wealth and trade. It was one of the Eight Gods of the Astarte or Asta Lokapala of the primitive times on human civilization. Cyprito again does not refer to Cyprus, it stands for the monastic Capotika or Kapotika, the most famous bird monastery of the ancient world which was then a part of Egyptian territory(Og Island). Sanctuary site of Vavla-Kapsalaes identifies Arabela or Alaba or Alavi, Alburg or Uruvela monastery linked to Kapasalaes(or Capala, or Kapalika) monastery near Epirus and Alexandria. This is how the present archaeological study stumbles on its knowledge of the ancient world. It does not refer to information preserved in other literature. Stone fragments should not be relied upon when Europe and Middle East are the ‘second settlements’ of ancient migrants after the Flood. Failure of the concepts and approaches of landscape archaeology does not help in revealing any truth significant to history of ancient religions. To link everything to environments in the Mediterranean region is a great failure for modern academic scholarship.
© All rights reserved, 2022, Akhil Kumar Sahoo. Design : Maskin Coder India